PyStarDict

Oh! Here goes download link [link] -- Serge Matveenko jabber:[email protected] microblog:[link] profile:[link] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyStarDict" group.

Hi, folks! Version v0.6 of the PyStarDict library is a little bit faster than v0.4, could be build as deb-package and released also as tar.xz archive packed via xz-utils. There are also fixes for Python 2.6 in this version. Cheers, Serge "lig" ... [More] Matveenko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyStarDict" group. [Less]

I feel a bit sceptical about this way. Looks like we cannot know word's position until we unpack it. Possibly we could find a specific word by regex but this will take as much time on every word lookup as we spending for idx load now. Please run your tests with PyStarDict v0.4. It seems you could get

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 02:07:37 0300 I think we don't need to unpack every word, we can use regex find every word's position, when look up, we retrive data at the postion of this word, just at this time we unpack .

Hello all! I've released PyStarDict v0.4 that have great speed improvements and new dictionary methods implemented. Look for it on sf.net download page: [link]

i've already implement it with some fixes. look for latest master git tree here [link]

---------- Forwarded message ---------- To: [email protected] 2009/1/2 Serge Matveenko <[email protected]>: a new path(a litter change). this path is for the laster pystardict version. t.py -- speed test for regexp t2.py -- speed test for old arithmetic. my test result 30M idx t.py -- 20s t2.py --50s

Hi! Thank you for this path. As i cannot see any tests of this path in your letter i will try to make such tests by myself. After that i hope to see real speed difference. Unfortunately i cannot see what version this patch for exactly and going to implement this regexp method manualy.

On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:31:09 0300 It's what I mean, but I express it not exactly. I'm working on it.

there is no byte by byte file reading there is only byte by byte parsing directly in memory of whole file read at once into byte buffer i willl be glad to know it