makerbot

I Use This!

Activity Not Available

Analyzed 11 months ago. based on code collected 11 months ago.

Project Summary

We are an open source hardware company and this is where you can find all of our awesome open source hardware. We use Google Code to host our releases so that they can be distributed easily and reliably. We will be posting releases of all the files used to create our designs: lasercut design files, software, firmware, 3D designs, electroncis designs, etc.

You can view all our documentation on our wiki. Our subversion repository is located at http://svn.makerbot.com.

MakerBot is a derivative project of RepRap. Our goals are slightly different: we aim to build an awesome, reliable, cheap, and open source 3D printer. Self-replication is not high on our list, but if we can accomplish that as well at some point in time, then that would be excellent.

Cheers from the MakerBot Team,

Zach, Bre, and Adam

In a Nutshell, makerbot...

...
has had 1,291 commits made by 31 contributors
representing 110,674 lines of code
...
is mostly written in C++
with a well-commented source code
...
has a young, but established codebase
maintained by nobody
with stable Y-O-Y commits
...
took an estimated 28 years of effort (COCOMO model)
starting with its first commit in June, 2012
ending with its most recent commit over 10 years ago

Quick Reference

Project Links:

Homepage

Code Locations:

https://github.com/makerbot/Migh...

Similar Projects:

Managers:

Become the first manager for makerbot

Licenses

GNU General Public License v3.0 or later

Permitted

Commercial Use

Modify

Distribute

Place Warranty

Use Patent Claims

Forbidden

Sub-License

Hold Liable

Required

Distribute Original

Disclose Source

Include Copyright

State Changes

Include License

Include Install Instructions

These details are provided for information only. No information here is legal advice and should not be used as such.

All Licenses

This Project has No vulnerabilities Reported Against it

Did You Know...

...
nearly 1 in 3 companies have no process for identifying, tracking, or remediating known open source vulnerabilities
...
check out hot projects on the Open Hub
...
in 2016, 47% of companies did not have formal process in place to track OS code
...
compare projects before you chose one to use