Dear Open Hub Users,
We’re excited to announce that we will be moving the Open Hub Forum to
https://community.blackduck.com/s/black-duck-open-hub.
Beginning immediately, users can head over,
register,
get technical help and discuss issue pertinent to the Open Hub. Registered users can also subscribe to Open Hub announcements here.
On May 1, 2020, we will be freezing https://www.openhub.net/forums and users will not be able to create new discussions. If you have any questions and concerns, please email us at
info@openhub.net
The following contributor to PHP looks like an automated script: https://www.ohloh.net/p/php/contributors/122406570302
Maybe you can just drop the enlistenment and rescan it? Thanks, Diego
AFAIK autoconf configure scripts are always accompanied by the configure.ac/configure.in files from which they were generated. This is another reasonably robust heuristics that you can use to identify configure scripts generated by autoconf.
The code statistics for the HIPL project are complete nonsense. A negative line count is reported and the language analysis is bogus: https://www.ohloh.net/p/hipl/analyses/latest This could be
Thanks for the quick reaction. But something is still amiss.. - if you look at the code analysis you will notice a negative line count. The statistics about programming languages used are quite