Dear Open Hub Users,
We’re excited to announce that we will be moving the Open Hub Forum to
https://community.blackduck.com/s/black-duck-open-hub.
Beginning immediately, users can head over,
register,
get technical help and discuss issue pertinent to the Open Hub. Registered users can also subscribe to Open Hub announcements here.
On May 1, 2020, we will be freezing https://www.openhub.net/forums and users will not be able to create new discussions. If you have any questions and concerns, please email us at
info@openhub.net
I believe currently ohloh converts SVN/CVS/hg repositories to git. Along with those that are natively in git, you must have quite an impressive collection of git repositories.
I would love it if you became an official source of these for those want to work on projects that are offered in inferior SCMs.
I am thinking along the lines of:
git clone git://ohloh.com/git/vim
... even though vim is actually maintained in CVS (and also exported in SVN).
Why not do it myself? Well, there are many reasons. Including:
What are your thoughts?
Hi Bart,
This is actually something that we've considered. So far we've converted about 30,000 repositories to Git, which I guess does make an impressive collection.
But we are storing a growing number of repositories in their original format. Hg, some svn, and soon bzr repositories are all mirrored in their native formats.
Subversion is only converted to Git if an attempt at svnsync
fails. Our Subversion collection splits down the middle on this.
In the end, the only thing we're consistently converting to Git is CVS.
Our Git conversions are rather mercenary. Our goal is not a full-fidelity mirror; we merely want to trace the code changes in a single branch. So we throw away all the binary files, anything on other branches, and other miscellany. The result has everything we need for an Ohloh report, but is not complete enough for development work.
I think this is a really interesting idea, and a while ago I might have guessed we might do this, but it doesn't seem practical (or in reality, all that useful) now.
Thanks,
Robin
Thanks for your answer. Maybe google will do it :) They have the bandwidth.