Forums : Technical Issue Help
Dear Open Hub Users,
We’re excited to announce that we will be moving the Open Hub Forum to
https://community.blackduck.com/s/black-duck-open-hub.
Beginning immediately, users can head over,
register,
get technical help and discuss issue pertinent to the Open Hub. Registered users can also subscribe to Open Hub announcements here.
On May 1, 2020, we will be freezing https://www.openhub.net/forums and users will not be able to create new discussions. If you have any questions and concerns, please email us at
info@openhub.net
Project not analysed
I think I wrote this before but I cannot find it on the forums so I am writing it again.
The project
https://www.openhub.net/p/kde-l10n
is not analysed anymore. It's been over a year now.
I tried to change the repos by using the parent folders only, so cutting their number down to 4 but with more revisions and files but it did not work either, so I went back to adding all sub-repos again.
Can you do anything about that?
Thanks
Hi Frederik;
We can try to babysit this, but it looks like a number of the 283 repositories have issues of their own.
You can see this at https://www.openhub.net/p/kde-l10n/enlistments by paging through the enlistments. Most of the repositories don't respond to the request for an update. A number of them have failed when we tried to get updated code.
We'll see if we can't coax these along.
Hello Peter,
thank you for your reply. And sorry for not answering sooner but the post seemed to have vanished from the forum page, so I needed to use the search to find it.
All those folders are from the same repo. If there are problems, they are temporary.
I tried to register them differenty by using
.../trunk-kf5/
instead of all those
.../trunk-kf5/af
.../trunk-kf5/ar
[...]
but then the update would not finish in weeks probably due to the number of files. So I tried registering all the sub folders separately hoping they would finish more reliably (smaller jobs) but it has been weeks again after changing the enlistments. It's almost the same number of files both ways but its 283 small folders against 3 folders. While there seemed to be problems with both approaches, is one of those considered preferred
with regards to the implementation of the fetching and analysing process?
Regards,
Frederik