Dear Open Hub Users,
We’re excited to announce that we will be moving the Open Hub Forum to
https://community.blackduck.com/s/black-duck-open-hub.
Beginning immediately, users can head over,
register,
get technical help and discuss issue pertinent to the Open Hub. Registered users can also subscribe to Open Hub announcements here.
On May 1, 2020, we will be freezing https://www.openhub.net/forums and users will not be able to create new discussions. If you have any questions and concerns, please email us at
[email protected]
Hi,
Recently, I've added libLAS project (http://www.ohloh.net/projects/10742) to the Ohloh.net. Everything works great except surprising analysis of programming language in which the libLAS is written. The libLAS is C++ library but the analysis (http://www.ohloh.net/projects/10742/analyses/latest) says it's written in:
I'd be thankful if someone could explain me this result. Perhaps long autoconf scripts like ./configure, etc. are measured and ranked higher than the core sources. Is this correct?
Regards,
Mateusz Loskot
Hi Mateusz,
You've guessed the problem exactly. This project has 1130 lines of C++. Meanwhile, the configure script has 15,975 lines, and the ltmain.sh script has 5322 lines.
Hi Robin,
Thank you for the confirmation. Now, everything is clear to me.
Regards