1
I Use This!
Activity Not Available

News

Analyzed about 1 year ago. based on code collected about 1 year ago.
Posted over 16 years ago by abstratt
Shorthand notation for both composite and aggregate associations has just been checked in (r99-r100). It follows the same spirit as the existing shorthand for plain associations (a.k.a. references). composition  : ; or aggregation  : ; That will ... [More] result in a new unnamed association with two member ends, one named, owned by the declaring classifier, with […] [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago by abstratt
I often see the TextUML Toolkit being compared to tools that produce UML diagrams from textual descriptions. Examples of tools like that are ModSL, MetaUML and UMLGraph. But that doesn’t really make sense, and here is why: these tools produce diagrams from text. The TextUML Toolkit produces models from text. But what is the difference […]
Posted over 16 years ago by abstratt
I often see the TextUML Toolkit being compared to tools that produce UML diagrams from textual descriptions. Examples of tools like that are ModSL, MetaUML and UMLGraph. But that doesn’t really make sense, and here is why: these tools produce diagrams from text. The TextUML Toolkit produces models from text. But what is the difference [...]
Posted over 16 years ago by rafael.chaves
I often see the TextUML Toolkit being compared to tools that produce UML diagrams from textual descriptions. Examples of tools like that are ModSL, MetaUML and UMLGraph. But that doesn’t really make sense, and here is why: these tools produce diagrams from text. The TextUML Toolkit produces models from text. But what is the difference [...]
Posted over 16 years ago by abstratt
I often see the TextUML Toolkit being compared to tools that produce UML diagrams from textual descriptions. Examples of tools like that are ModSL, MetaUML and UMLGraph. But that doesn’t really make sense, and here is why: these tools produce diagrams from text. The TextUML Toolkit produces models from text. But what is the difference […]
Posted over 16 years ago by abstratt
TextUML Toolkit 1.1 is out! This is the first release after the TextUML Toolkit became an open source project. Besides the adoption of the Eclipse Public License, these are the new features that were added in 1.1: more UML features exposed by the ... [More] textual notation: abstract operations and parameter direction modifiers more diagram layout controls […] [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago by rafael.chaves
TextUML Toolkit 1.1 is out! This is the first release after the TextUML Toolkit became an open source project. Besides the adoption of the Eclipse Public License, these are the new features that were added in 1.1: more UML features exposed by the ... [More] textual notation: abstract operations and parameter direction modifiers more diagram layout controls (compartments, elements [...] [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago by abstratt
TextUML Toolkit 1.1 is out! This is the first release after the TextUML Toolkit became an open source project. Besides the adoption of the Eclipse Public License, these are the new features that were added in 1.1: more UML features exposed by the ... [More] textual notation: abstract operations and parameter direction modifiers more diagram layout controls [...] [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago by abstratt
TextUML Toolkit 1.1 is out! This is the first release after the TextUML Toolkit became an open source project. Besides the adoption of the Eclipse Public License, these are the new features that were added in 1.1: more UML features exposed by the ... [More] textual notation: abstract operations and parameter direction modifiers more diagram layout controls […] [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago by abstratt
Since I started working on the TextUML Toolkit more than a year ago, I have been asking myself whether it would make sense to make it available under an open source license. Open sourcing a product is a tough decision. Once you take that road, there is no way back, at least not without risking […]