forgot to format this code... |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
after a bit more refactoring, the registered<> template really wasn't necessary, what this really needed was the global<> one. Yay for simplifications. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
well, the JSON code is still ugly, but it's getting better bit by bit. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
remove an unnecessary base type. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
split out the 'registered object' functionality, as that pattern is now shared by several things across the code. Update documentation, and reel in options into the test cases. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
remove maybe.h in favor of std::optional; change test signatures to return bool instead of int. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
document and simplify test case code; the next change will change the signature of the test cases to be bool(...) instead of int(...). |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
Trying an all-new direction with the test cases. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
no need to have several verbatim copies of the licence. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
ditch read the docs (for now), concentrate on cldoc. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
ah, I terminated that in the wrong place. Oops. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
yeah, this won't work as intended. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
minor hack until all the docs are updated |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
remove a few empty headers. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
update to cldoc, ditch doxygen. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
ditch libstdc++ - doesn't really seem to be working anywhere I care. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
try only doing code coverage on linux |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
do optimised builds. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
the test cases themselves actually aren't subject to code coverage metrics |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
sadness: of course the char* in the map doesn't have the correct sorting. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
some test case enhancements. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
osx/libstdc++ isn't really working out. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
maybe this will work with c++14 :3 |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
maybe there's the packages we want in ubuntu 14.04. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
hmm, maybe it just needs a newer OS... |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
apparently there's no libc++ package on ubuntu 12.04? still confused about this... |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
yay for multi-escaping? |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
sigh, why is it so hard to tell ubuntu to install libc++... |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
hmm, i thought clang 3.4 could deal with c++14... |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|
update toolchain specs, etc. |
|
More...
|
almost 8 years ago
|