Posted
over 16 years
ago
I'm trying to use a named query in this function, in place of the commented code (which works ok).
[code] public DadesIncidencia getIncidenciaByIdSenseComentaris(Integer id) {
DadesIncidencia incidencia = null;
Query q =
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
[img]http://www.datanucleus.org/images/logos/DataNucleus_AccessPlatform_80.jpg[/img]
We're pleased to announce the release of the third milestone for Access Platform version 1.0 ("Faraday").
You can read the release announcement [url=http://www.datanucleus.com/news/access_platform_1_0_m3.html]here[/url].
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
Hi!
We are having trouble with detached objects. We are getting a JDODataStoreException while removing/adding an Object with uniqueness constraints and persisting the container that references the Object.
Should i raise a JIRA case? Or does
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
Hi,
maybe this is a dumb question, maybe this has been answered already (but I did not find any suitable threads here).
Within a normal persistent object, I have a List field referring to other persistent objects. Both classes are FCOs. Since
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
1.0.0.m2 - NPE on Persistence of 1-N List with "subclass-table" elements with single subclass with table as per http://www.jpox.org/servlet/jira/browse/CORE-3344:
Testcase attached.
ownerTable is null @ RDBMSManager.java:1152
1152
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
Hi,
I am playing with the LDAP store. When running the tests in test.jdo.ldap one test is broken, it is JDOQLBasicTest.testGrouping. The strange thing is that all elements of the iterator contain the same data. So when I add the following code
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
With latest JPOX 1.2.2, a JDO query w/ a contains(var) where we do an instanceof check on the var doesn't seem to compile correctly in SQL.
Please see attached smallest test case I could do with 3 classes:
WebContent.linkSet is a List
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
I have two classes with a M-to-N relation over a join table:[code]
...
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
Can somebody give me a hint what has changed with the automatic detaching at commit since June 3?
We are using a JPOX snapshot from this date with DetachAllOnCommit=true and no maxFetchDepth set. This is working fine.
If I try to use a newer JPOX
|
Posted
over 16 years
ago
Hello *,
we have already for quite a while a problem when persisting new objects, because the fields of them still reference detached objects even after calling [i]pm.makePersistent[/i] (with some work-arounds - like evictAll reload - it is
|