Irony — .NET Language Implementation Kit

Here you go => http://stackoverflow.com/questions/334479/repository-of-bnf-grammars/334539#334539

thanks. it works.

Just add ... | id_simple; to typeName rule

I need simple t-sql parser and I started with demo SqlGrammar. t-sql escaping ([, ]) works fine with identifiers (it looks that there is some "magic" inside call var Id_simple = TerminalFactory.CreateSqlExtIdentifier(this, "id_simple"); but I ... [More] need this also for typenames so for example create table abc ([a] [int]) could work (now it's problem with [int] which is not recognised) How should I change rule typeName.Rule = ToTerm("BIT") | "DATE" | "TIME" | "TIMESTAMP" | "DECIMAL" | "REAL" | "FLOAT" | "SMALLINT" | "INTEGER" that it will also support sql quotes [, ]? Thanks for help Matej [Less]

Rated 2 Stars (out of 5) - tried a number of the example grammars and they all throw exceptions of one kind or another....pity...

Hi Roman Thank you very much for replying back to me. You are right, I just changed again and it worked, when I subclass InterpretedLanguageGrammar didn't work before and I thought this is only for scripting languages. I did it now and it is ... [More] working. I have one more question, should I use DoEvaluate to validate the programming syntax , to generate MSIL code, or both? [Less]

all these things are built to work together, so if you want to use evaluation machinery already there, you should follow the rules, like using InterpretedLanguageGrammar as a base class. I don't understand, what is the big problem switching to it as a base class? Just change one word in class declaration

Hi All, I noticed that if you need to evaluate you need to have ScriptThread var output = rooAST.Evaluate(thread); and in order to create ScriptThread object you need a ScriptApp object, but the constructor of the ScriptApp expects your grammar ... [More] to be child class of InterpretedLanguageGrammar not Grammar. I did build my grammar by subclassing Grammar and I don't know what is the best way to solve this issue (All non-terminals got theri ASTNode class). Thanks [Less]

Is it possible to switch between multiple separate grammars when parsing one file with Irony? Like for HTML mixed with PHP for example. Achieving independent coloring and validation. How would I start extending Irony to support that if it's not available feature yet?

Hi All, I am really unable to understand how to fix this issue, I am been trying a lot and rewrote the grammar based on C# grammar, I studied it very well. Here is my code: this.Root = compilation_unit; compilation_unit.Rule = ... [More] module_declarations_opt; module_declarations_opt.Rule = MakeStarRule(module_declarations_opt, null, module_declaration); module_declaration.Rule = "module" + qualified_identifier + module_body + semi_opt; qualified_identifier.Rule = MakePlusRule(qualified_identifier, dot, identifier); module_body.Rule = "{" + reference_directives_opt + module_member_declarations + "}"; reference_directives_opt.Rule = Empty | reference_directives; reference_directives.Rule = MakePlusRule(reference_directives_opt, null, reference_directive); reference_directive.Rule = "refernece" + qual_name_with_targs + semi; qual_name_with_targs.Rule = identifier_or_builtin; identifier_or_builtin.Rule = identifier | builtin_type; builtin_type.Rule = ToTerm("boolean") | "integer" | "decimal" | "string" | "object"; module_member_declarations.Rule = MakePlusRule(module_member_declarations, null, module_member_declaration); module_member_declaration.Rule = /*module_declaration |*/ type_declaration; type_declaration.Rule = Empty; // class_declaration;// | interface_declaration; // | enum_declaration; [Less]