Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Opeyemi Adesina)
Hi, I've fixed the problem. Thank you. Ope
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Andrew Forward)
I use multiple code injections at times, mostly when using * for general purpose injections with specific ones. I would still see this as a low priority change. -- aforward
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Timothy Lethbridge)
Yes, Tim Timothy C. Lethbridge, PhD, P.Eng., I.S.P., CSDP Professor of Software Engineering and Computer Science / Professeur Titulaire de g�nie logiciel et d'informatique Facult� de genie / Faculty of Engineering University of Ottawa / Universit� d'Ottawa Tel: 613-562-5800x6685 Fax: 613-562-5664 Mobile: 613-252-1850
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Geoffrey Guest)
So, I'll raise an issue and not worry about it for now?
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Timothy Lethbridge)
Interesting issue. Good point; I can't see a ready way around this. One wonders how common such a situation (multiple code injections for the same method) would be. If relatively uncommon, this could be relegated to a lower priority. Tim Timothy C. Lethbridge, PhD, P.Eng., I.S.P., CSDP
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Timothy Lethbridge)
Hi Adesina, So you were running the tests 'by themselves'. I normally only do that after I have made changes and compiled them using ant -Dmyenv=local -f build.umple.xml umpleSelf compile packageMainJar First things to confirm though: 1. Had you made any changes? Or was this a 'fresh checkout' or at least
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
Fellow Contributors, I experienced some umple test failure after executing the following command from Linux terminal: ant -Dmyenv=local -f build.umple.xml template.test The following is the list of output statements from the terminal: Buildfile: /home/normalthing/Umple/umple- read-only/build/build.umple.xm l
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Geoffrey Guest)
So, I have a problem: after getX { "stuff".toString(); } before getX { "otherStuff".toString(); } after getX { ((Object)null).toString(); } will produce public String getX() { //line 2 "m.ump" "otherStuff".toString(); // get method internals //line 3 "m.ump" "stuff".toString();
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Timothy Lethbridge)
Hi, The problem with 'trace' in UmpleOnline is now solved, with a couple of javascript changes. Tim Timothy C. Lethbridge, PhD, P.Eng., I.S.P., CSDP Professor of Software Engineering and Computer Science / Professeur Titulaire de g�nie logiciel et d'informatique Facult� de genie / Faculty of Engineering
|
Posted
over 11 years
ago
by
[email protected]
(Timothy Lethbridge)
Hi, I have isolated the problem with UmpleOnline when a 'trace' statement is present. The is a method 'format' in 'trace.js' that substitutes any occurrence of a substring looking like {3} with the argument of that number plus 1. Then it repeats (until no further changes are needed) in case the argument
|